Git Pull a Certain Branch from Github

Simply track your remote branches explicitly and a simple git pull will do just what you want:

git branch -f remote_branch_name origin/remote_branch_name
git checkout remote_branch_name

The latter is a local operation.

Or even more fitting in with the GitHub documentation on forking:

git branch -f new_local_branch_name upstream/remote_branch_name

A safe approach is to create a local branch (i.e. xyz) first and then pull the remote branch into your locals.

# create a local branch
git checkout -b xyz

# make sure you are on the newly created branch
git branch

# finally pull the remote branch to your local branch
git pull origin xyz

Here is the syntax that could pull a remote branch to a local branch.

git pull {repo} {remotebranchname}:{localbranchname}

git pull origin xyz:xyz

The best way is:

git checkout -b <new_branch> <remote repo name>/<new_branch>

git fetch will grab the latest list of branches.

Now you can git checkout MyNewBranch

Done :)

For more info see docs: git fetch

I am not sure I fully understand the problem, but pulling an existing branch is done like this (at least it works for me :)

git pull origin BRANCH

This is assuming that your local branch is created off of the origin/BRANCH.

Simply put, If you want to pull from GitHub the branch the-branch-I-want:

git fetch origin
git branch -f the-branch-I-want origin/the-branch-I-want
git checkout the-branch-I-want

This helped me to get remote branch before merging it into other:

git fetch repo xyz:xyz
git checkout xyz

for pulling the branch from GitHub you can use

git checkout --track origin/the-branch-name

Make sure that the branch name is exactly the same.

I did

git branch -f new_local_branch_name origin/remote_branch_name

Instead of

git branch -f new_local_branch_name upstream/remote_branch_name

As suggested by @innaM. When I used the upstream version, it said 'fatal: Not a valid object name: 'upstream/remote_branch_name''. I did not do git fetch origin as a comment suggested, but instead simply replaced upstream with origin. I guess they are equivalent.

git pull <gitreponame> <branchname>

Usually if you have only repo assigned to your code then the gitreponame would be origin.

If you are working on two repo's like one is local and another one for remote like you can check repo's list from git remote -v. this shows how many repo's are assigned to your current code.

BranchName should exists into corresponding gitreponame.

you can use following two commands to add or remove repo's

git remote add <gitreponame> <repourl>
git remote remove <gitreponame>

you may also do

git pull -r origin master

fix merge conflicts if any

git rebase --continue

-r is for rebase. This will make you branch structure from

        v  master       
o-o-o-o-o
     \o-o-o
          ^ other branch

to

        v  master       
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
              ^ other branch

This will lead to a cleaner history. Note: In case you have already pushed your other-branch to origin( or any other remote), you may have to force push your branch after rebase.

git push -f origin other-branch

you can try with

git branch -a

or git fetch to get latest list of branches.

git checkout theBranch //go in to the branch

git checkout -b "yourNewBranch" // to work in your own branch in base "theBranch"