How Consequentialist Different from Non Consequentialist?

A consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on the consequences that action has. ... A non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its consequences.

What is the difference between consequentialist theories and non-consequentialist theories quizlet?

According to consequentialism, the moral quality of an action is to be assessed entirely by appeal to consequences. Meanwhile, non-consequentialism holds that other things besides consequences can be significant from a moral point of view.

What is an example of non-consequentialist?

Non-Consequentialist Theories do not always ignore consequences. For example, some of Ross's prima facie duties (non-injury and beneficence, for instance) are directly related to promoting good consequences or minimizing bad ones, but others (fidelity, gratitude, justice) are not.