Parse Error: Adjacent Jsx Elements Must Be Wrapped in an Enclosing Tag

I am trying to set up my React.js app so that it only renders if a variable I have set is true.

The way my render function is set up looks like:

render: function() {
    var text = this.state.submitted ? 'Thank you!  Expect a follow up at '+email+' soon!' : 'Enter your email to request early access:';
    var style = this.state.submitted ? {"backgroundColor": "rgba(26, 188, 156, 0.4)"} : {};
    return (
    <div>

if(this.state.submitted==false) 
{

      <input type="email" className="input_field" onChange={this._updateInputValue} ref="email" value={this.state.email} />

      <ReactCSSTransitionGroup transitionName="example" transitionAppear={true}>
      <div className="button-row">
         <a href="#" className="button" onClick={this.saveAndContinue}>Request Invite</a>
     </div>
     </ReactCSSTransitionGroup>
}
   </div>
    )
  },

Basically, the important portion here is the if(this.state.submitted==false) portion (I want these div elements to show up when the submitted variable is set to false).

But when running this, I get the error in the question:

Uncaught Error: Parse Error: Line 38: Adjacent JSX elements must be wrapped in an enclosing tag

What is the issue here? And what can I use to make this work?

1

16 Answers

You should put your component between an enclosing tag, Which means:

// WRONG!

return (  
    <Comp1 />
    <Comp2 />
)

Instead:

// Correct

return (
    <div>
       <Comp1 />
       <Comp2 />
    </div>
)

Edit: Per Joe Clay's comment about the Fragments API

// More Correct

return (
    <React.Fragment>
       <Comp1 />
       <Comp2 />
    </React.Fragment>
)

// Short syntax

return (
    <>
       <Comp1 />
       <Comp2 />
    </>
)
2

It is late to answer this question but I thought It will add to the explanation.

It is happening because any where in your code you are returning two elements simultaneously.

e.g

return(
    <div id="div1"></div>
    <div id="div1"></div>
  )

It should be wrapped in a parent element. e.g

 return(
      <div id="parent">
        <div id="div1"></div>
        <div id="div1"></div>
      </div>
      )

More Detailed Explanation

Your below jsx code get transformed

class App extends React.Component {
  render(){
    return (
      <div>
        <h1>Welcome to React</h1>
      </div>
    );
  }
}

into this

_createClass(App, [{
    key: 'render',
    value: function render() {
      return React.createElement(
        'div',
        null,
        React.createElement(
          'h1',
          null,
          'Welcome to React'
        )
      );
    }
  }]);

But if you do this

class App extends React.Component {
  render(){
    return (
        <h1>Welcome to React</h1>
        <div>Hi</div>
    );
  }
}

this gets converted into this (Just for illustration purpose, actually you will get error : Adjacent JSX elements must be wrapped in an enclosing tag)

_createClass(App, [{
    key: 'render',
    value: function render() {
      return React.createElement(
        'div',
        null,
       'Hi'
      ); 
    return React.createElement(
          'h1',
          null,
          'Welcome to React'
        )
    }
  }]);

In the above code you can see that you are trying to return twice from a method call, which is obviously wrong.

Edit- Latest changes in React 16 and own-wards:

If you do not want to add extra div to wrap around and want to return more than one child components you can go with React.Fragments.

React.Fragments (<React.Fragments>)are little bit faster and has less memory usage (no need to create an extra DOM node, less cluttered DOM tree).

e.g (In React 16.2.0)

render() {
  return (
    <>
       React fragments.
      <h2>A heading</h2>
      More React fragments.
      <h2>Another heading</h2>
      Even more React fragments.
    </>
  );
}

or

render() {
  return (
    <React.Fragments>
       React fragments.
      <h2>A heading</h2>
      More React fragments.
      <h2>Another heading</h2>
      Even more React fragments.
    </React.Fragments>
  );
}

or

render() {
 return [
  "Some text.",
  <h2 key="heading-1">A heading</h2>,
  "More text.",
  <h2 key="heading-2">Another heading</h2>,
  "Even more text."
 ];
}
0

React element has to return only one element. You'll have to wrap both of your tags with another element tag.

I can also see that your render function is not returning anything. This is how your component should look like:

var app = React.createClass({
    render () {
        /*React element can only return one element*/
        return (
             <div></div>
        )
    }
})

Also note that you can't use if statements inside of a returned element:

render: function() {
var text = this.state.submitted ? 'Thank you!  Expect a follow up at '+email+' soon!' : 'Enter your email to request early access:';
var style = this.state.submitted ? {"backgroundColor": "rgba(26, 188, 156, 0.4)"} : {};
    if(this.state.submitted==false) {
        return <YourJSX />
    } else {
        return <YourOtherJSX />
    }
},
2

If you don't want to wrap it in another div as other answers have suggested, you can also wrap it in an array and it will work.

// Wrong!
return (  
   <Comp1 />
   <Comp2 />
)

It can be written as:

// Correct!
return (  
    [<Comp1 />,
    <Comp2 />]
)

Please note that the above will generate a warning: Warning: Each child in an array or iterator should have a unique "key" prop. Check the render method of 'YourComponent'.

This can be fixed by adding a key attribute to the components, if manually adding these add it like:

return (  
    [<Comp1 key="0" />,
    <Comp2 key="1" />]
)

Here is some more information on keys:Composition vs Inheritance

16

The problem

Parse Error: Adjacent JSX elements must be wrapped in an enclosing tag

This means that you are trying to return multiple sibling JSX elements in an incorrect manner. Remember that you are not writing HTML, but JSX! Your code is transpiled from JSX into JavaScript. For example:

render() {
  return (<p>foo bar</p>);
}

will be transpiled into:

render() {
  return React.createElement("p", null, "foo bar");
}

Unless you are new to programming in general, you already know that functions/methods (of any language) take any number of parameters but always only return one value. Given that, you can probably see that a problem arises when trying to return multiple sibling components based on how createElement() works; it only takes parameters for one element and returns that. Hence we cannot return multiple elements from one function call.


So if you've ever wondered why this works...

render() {
  return (
    <div>
      <p>foo</p>
      <p>bar</p>
      <p>baz</p>
    </div>
  );
}

but not this...

render() {
  return (
    <p>foo</p>
    <p>bar</p>
    <p>baz</p>
  );
}

it's because in the first snippet, both <p>-elements are part of children of the <div>-element. When they are part of children then we can express an unlimited number of sibling elements. Take a look how this would transpile:

render() {
  return React.createElement(
    "div",
    null,
    React.createElement("p", null, "foo"),
    React.createElement("p", null, "bar"),
    React.createElement("p", null, "baz"),
  );
}

Solutions

Depending on which version of React you are running, you do have a few options to address this:

  • Use fragments (React v16.2+ only!)

    As of React v16.2, React has support for Fragments which is a node-less component that returns its children directly.

    Returning the children in an array (see below) has some drawbacks:

    • Children in an array must be separated by commas.
    • Children in an array must have a key to prevent React’s key warning.
    • Strings must be wrapped in quotes.

    These are eliminated from the use of fragments. Here's an example of children wrapped in a fragment:

    render() {
      return (
        <>
          <ChildA />
          <ChildB />
          <ChildC />
        </>
      );
    }
    

    which de-sugars into:

    render() {
      return (
        <React.Fragment>
          <ChildA />
          <ChildB />
          <ChildC />
        </React.Fragment>
      );
    }
    

    Note that the first snippet requires Babel v7.0 or above.


James H. Sterling

James H. Sterling

Environmental Science & Climate Journalist

James Sterling reports on renewable energy developments, climate policy, ecological conservation, and green tech innovations around the globe.