Who's up for a Juicy Conspiracy Theory About President Donald Trump?

Quick Take

Everyone loves a good conspiracy theory. Whether it's Ted Cruz being the Zodiac Killer, or Katy Perry actually being a grown-up JonBenét Ramsey, there's nothing more fun than briefly considering a hairbrained idea before dismissing it as ridiculous. The latest, however, involves none other than President Donald Trump. What if, he's not actually Donald Trump at all, but...

A CLONE PLANTED BY THE ILLUMINATI AFTER THEY MURDERED HIM IN THE 1980s?!?!?!? I dunno, decide for yourself:

“The Donald Trump you see now campaigning on stage for the election is a clone,” says YouTuber Yahua Servant. “He’s dead, his family and daughter and wife are fake mannequins — kids fake, dead. See the skin? It’s a mannequin.”

There were plenty of jokes made about Melania being robotic (or just over this shit) based on her expressions at the Inauguration, but a clone and/or automaton? That's something.

Death And Taxes breaks down servant's (very compelling) argument thus:

1. The red ties Trump often wears are the mark of Satan, and the president frequently makes Masonic gestures. Thus, he is a demon.

2. Melania’s eyes are “robotoid” eyes. They cannot belong to a real person, thus, she is a mannequin.

3. Trump’s “yuge” pupils are also robotoid, which expose him as a clone. “Not normal."

4. Trump has been photographed making handgun gestures, which is actually a sign for devil horns. “It’s fake, cloned… all synthetics.”

5. Melania and Trump’s son is also apparently a robotoid as well. Those eyes.

SEEMS PRETTY AIRTIGHT TO ME. If a red tie is the mark of Satan, that would explain... a whole hell of a lot, actually, given that practically every elected official in Washington has been spotted in a red tie at one point or another, regardless of political affiliation.

Has Donald Trump actually been replaced by a clone/ mannequin/ "robotoid" because he was murdered by a shadowy world government 30 years ago? Probably not, no, but we live in a world of alternative facts where the burden of proof is now on the person disputing the claim, not the one making it.

H/T: Brobible

Sarah Jenkins

Sarah Jenkins

Senior Technology Editor & AI Specialist

Sarah Jenkins is a veteran tech journalist with over 12 years of experience covering artificial intelligence, mobile innovations, and digital ethics. Her insights have appeared in leading technology publications worldwide.

Share this article
Twitter Facebook Pinterest